Institutionalizing graft and corruption as what happened during her term is one thing, but stealing the presidency is another.
What if it is proven that Gloria Macapagal Arroyo had indeed cheated her way to the presidency in the 2004 elections? What next?
She has already completed her six-year term, scandal-riddled though it was. If, as former Commission on Elections supervisor Lintang Bedol’s claim that there was massive cheating during those polls – more than enough to alter the final results – is proven correct, there is nothing more that can be done except to hold the former president accountable for her theft of the presidency from the late Fernando Poe Jr.
We will never know what an FPJ presidency would have been like. The popular actor died shortly after the elections. If he was indeed the winner, and if he had still passed away, then whoever was elected vice president would have become chief executive.
That vice president would have been either Mrs. Arroyo’s running mate, Noli de Castro, who was declared winner and who also served a full term, or Poe’s running mate, Senator Loren Legarda.
Legarda, it will be recalled, had filed an election protest, but gave it up when she later ran for reelection as senator, and then had a second, failed, bid to become vice president in 2010. In last year’s elections, she had seemingly lost her touch, landing a poor third place to eventual winner Jejomar Binay and second placer Mar Roxas.
If FPJ had won, then it stands to reason that Legarda might have won too. Although the vice presidential race is treated separately from the presidential derby in Philippine elections, the alleged massive cheating that worked against Poe would also have been detrimental to Legarda’s cause. She might have been the Philippine president following Poe’s demise.
Analysts will say this is all water under the bridge. But to let the massive cheating that supposedly occurred pass would be an enormous crime against the republic. If one person could cheat her way to the presidency, then any other future candidate can take the same route. That illegitimate president, along with his or her family and favored cronies, would again rob the country blind.
In effect, the democracy that the Philippines claims is no democracy at all. The country would be no better than some African, Arab or South American countries where leaders appoint themselves, completely disregarding the will of their people.
The Arroyo camp can resort to whatever legal arguments they want. The issue is far from being moot and academic. The fact cannot be erased that there were serious doubts about the legitimacy of her presidency.
If it seems that Mrs. Arroyo is being unfairly persecuted by the current administration for imagined sins, as her followers claim, she has no one to blame but herself. Institutionalizing graft and corruption as what happened during her term is one thing, but stealing the presidency is another. Such an unspeakable crime cannot be allowed to pass simply because her term as president has passed.
The accusations made by Bedol, as well as former Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao governor Zaldy Ampatuan, that Mrs. Arroyo and her inner circle conspired to steal the presidency should not be taken lightly. Mrs. Arroyo must face her accusers in a court of law, and be punished to the law’s fullest extent if found guilty.